Datei:Rubin-Embossed.png: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus GIB - Glossar der Bildphilosophie
(Experiment zur Einfluß der Konturlinie Quelle: <bib id='Andrews et.al. 2002a'></bib> Fig. 3 mit Unterschrift: „Stimulus and task for Experiment 2.1. Subjects were initially presented with the Rubin’s ambiguous vase–face stimulus and instru) |
|||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| − | + | <bibimport/> | |
Experiment zur Einfluß der Konturlinie | Experiment zur Einfluß der Konturlinie | ||
Quelle: <bib id='Andrews et.al. 2002a'></bib> Fig. 3 mit Unterschrift: „Stimulus and task for Experiment 2.1. Subjects were initially presented with the Rubin’s ambiguous vase–face stimulus and instructed to indicate alternations in perception between the vase and faces by button presses. Since the periods of spontaneous perceptual dominance were short compared with the time constant of the BOLD response, we designed an event-related paradigm in which the sudden onset of perception of either (a) the faces or (b) the vase was prolonged by adding subtle local contrast gradients (embossing) to one edge or other of the figure–ground boundary. In (a), following a vase-to-faces transition, the standard image was replaced by an embossed-face version of the same stimulus, whereas in (b), | Quelle: <bib id='Andrews et.al. 2002a'></bib> Fig. 3 mit Unterschrift: „Stimulus and task for Experiment 2.1. Subjects were initially presented with the Rubin’s ambiguous vase–face stimulus and instructed to indicate alternations in perception between the vase and faces by button presses. Since the periods of spontaneous perceptual dominance were short compared with the time constant of the BOLD response, we designed an event-related paradigm in which the sudden onset of perception of either (a) the faces or (b) the vase was prolonged by adding subtle local contrast gradients (embossing) to one edge or other of the figure–ground boundary. In (a), following a vase-to-faces transition, the standard image was replaced by an embossed-face version of the same stimulus, whereas in (b), | ||
subsequent to a faces-to-vase change, an embossed-vase version replaced the standard.“ | subsequent to a faces-to-vase change, an embossed-vase version replaced the standard.“ | ||
| + | |||
| + | vgl.: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/11083320_Activity_in_the_Fusiform_Gyrus_Predicts_Conscious_Perception_of_Rubin's_VaseFace_Illusion | ||
| + | |||
| + | <bibprint/> | ||
Version vom 16. November 2015, 13:16 Uhr
Experiment zur Einfluß der Konturlinie
Quelle: [Andrews et.al. 2002a]Andrews, Timothy J.; Schluppeck, Denis; Homfray, Dave; Matthews, Paul & Blakemore, Colin (2002).Activity in the Fusiform Gyrus Predicts Conscious Perception of Rubin’s Vase–Face Illusion. In NeuroImage, 17, 890–901.
Eintrag in Sammlung zeigen Fig. 3 mit Unterschrift: „Stimulus and task for Experiment 2.1. Subjects were initially presented with the Rubin’s ambiguous vase–face stimulus and instructed to indicate alternations in perception between the vase and faces by button presses. Since the periods of spontaneous perceptual dominance were short compared with the time constant of the BOLD response, we designed an event-related paradigm in which the sudden onset of perception of either (a) the faces or (b) the vase was prolonged by adding subtle local contrast gradients (embossing) to one edge or other of the figure–ground boundary. In (a), following a vase-to-faces transition, the standard image was replaced by an embossed-face version of the same stimulus, whereas in (b),
subsequent to a faces-to-vase change, an embossed-vase version replaced the standard.“
[Andrews et.al. 2002a]: Andrews, Timothy J.; Schluppeck, Denis; Homfray, Dave; Matthews, Paul & Blakemore, Colin (2002). Activity in the Fusiform Gyrus Predicts Conscious Perception of Rubin’s Vase–Face Illusion. NeuroImage, Band: 17, S. 890–901.Dateiversionen
Klicken Sie auf einen Zeitpunkt, um diese Version zu laden.
| Version vom | Vorschaubild | Maße | Benutzer | Kommentar | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aktuell | 13:13, 16. Nov. 2015 |  | 504 × 692 (59 KB) | Joerg R.J. Schirra (Diskussion | Beiträge) | Experiment zur Einfluß der Konturlinie Quelle: <bib id='Andrews et.al. 2002a'></bib> Fig. 3 mit Unterschrift: „Stimulus and task for Experiment 2.1. Subjects were initially presented with the Rubin’s ambiguous vase–face stimulus and instr |
- Du kannst diese Datei nicht überschreiben.
Dateiverwendung
Die folgenden 3 Seiten verwenden diese Datei:
